Perhaps my best (or perhaps worst) characteristic is that I'm permanently disappointed with my very own understanding.

This might be the reason I have actually shown a specific skill for maths and also physics. Just recognizing is never ever sufficient for me; I must at least try to rigorously understand the reasoning behind the mathematics I do, and after that, take my understanding to its restrictions. Profusely asking why something is the way it is, maybe to the aggravation of my speakers, is something I'm obliged to do. I, in addition to many others, consider this Socratic approach of understanding and also mentor to be extremely valuable in building a basic understanding of mathematics and physics from standard concepts, and I endeavour to educate in specifically this manner.

I hope I could encourage trainees with my extreme love of mathematics and physics or, at the minimum, disclose the topics as far less complicated than they appear. Naturally not every person is a mathematician, and different minds discover at various speeds, however I will certainly intend to leave a long-term and advantageous perception.